It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:18 pm

All times are UTC






Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 


Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:50 am 
Offline
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 6227
Images: 1729
Check the lanterns closely, as it might be you are looking at two different versions: one with internal gear and one with external gear.

Also on the subject, the GEC Z953x series is a bit odd like this.... with side entry geared versions like the Z9538 the lampholder is at the 'road' end of the lantern, hinged with the geartray; whilst the top entry version, the Z9539, has the lampholder at the 'pavement' end of the lantern... this picture below shows this off using the top two lanterns as examples (both lanterns are orientatedfor the road end to be at the left)
Image

_________________
Tesco brings all the mums to the yard...
and they're like "do you have your club card"
Image


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:36 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 1814
Images: 200
Here's a question...

GEC's range of street lighting lanterns usually consisted of a Z prefix followed by four numbers. However, some lanterns carried a ZD prefix followed by three, four or five numbers. What made GEC decide to use a ZD prefix rather than a Z prefix?


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:54 pm
Posts: 967
Images: 24
sotonsteve wrote:
Here's a question...

GEC's range of street lighting lanterns usually consisted of a Z prefix followed by four numbers. However, some lanterns carried a ZD prefix followed by three, four or five numbers. What made GEC decide to use a ZD prefix rather than a Z prefix?


I understand that the 'D' stood for Decorative.


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:25 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 1814
Images: 200
Claire wrote:
sotonsteve wrote:
Here's a question...

GEC's range of street lighting lanterns usually consisted of a Z prefix followed by four numbers. However, some lanterns carried a ZD prefix followed by three, four or five numbers. What made GEC decide to use a ZD prefix rather than a Z prefix?


I understand that the 'D' stood for Decorative.


That's interesting. That makes sense if you look at the 'saucers' to which this applies, but there are some anomalies. The geared version of the Z5670 (ZD6526) may be a post-top, but in my opinion it was a functional post-top and no more decorative than the standard Z5670 series. There was also the catenary motorway lantern and 'brick' (ZD3230 and ZD4565), which were designed for use on motorways.


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:30 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:54 pm
Posts: 2977
Images: 210
The ZD anomalies on the non decorative GEC lanterns has got me thinking.

I'll hazard a guess but I could be wrong, could the ZD designation on the non decorative lanterns be down to the lack of Zxxxx possibilities? As there where a few codes used for the various 'Bricks' series, even though it was the same lantern a different code was used depending on what was different with the lantern such as spigot design for example.

_________________
From streetlighting to radio, dance through the night whilst the streetlights are glowing outside.


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:44 am 
Offline
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 6227
Images: 1729
That might be it... they probably started off with ZD to mean 'decorative' lanterns, but as they got certain lanterns with so many variations they ran out of numbers and so somebody probably said "stick a ZD in front of a random number and that's what we'll call it"! :lol:

_________________
Tesco brings all the mums to the yard...
and they're like "do you have your club card"
Image


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:02 pm 
Offline
Member
Random avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:47 pm
Posts: 182
Images: 1
I've also noticed the ZD prefix used for identifying certain GEC lantern castings, although not necessarily bearing any relation to the lantern code itself. All interesting stuff  8-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:51 pm 
Offline
Site Administration
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 3402
Images: 27
Location: Salisbury
At Whiteley in Fareham borough, Hampshire are some SON GEC bricks dating from the mid 1980s. They don’t appear in any GEC catalogues and Simon Cornwell’s site doesn’t have any info on them.

Image

A chance discovery by sotonsteve has solved the mystery, they are GEC ZD8305 lanterns. More in the collection thread.


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:22 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:21 pm
Posts: 316
Images: 0
Whilst having a sort through some of my vintage streetlighting "bumf", I came across this sheet. Interesting reading actually,  as it was an "Advance Information Sheet" for a modified Z5590 and one which I haven't come across before. The GEC product description code is: Z5590/1"CO".

"The lantern is designed for use in the vicinity of airfields,  and for dock and waterside lighting, where a cut-off distribution is required. The lantern is suitable for use with 60-200 watt Osram pearl tungsten filament BC or ES cap; or 80 watt or 125 watt Osram MB/U or MBF/U mercury vapour lamp. The lantern has a symmetric, cut-off distribution".

As is typical, there is no date reference on the sheet. Much use was obviously made of an existing lantern, with key elements retained. Despite mention of a "tropicalised felt gasket . . . to make a weatherproof joint when the lantern was closed", there seems to be no inclusion of the usual flat glass into the outer shade. Perhaps in the absence of a reliable neoprene rubber, having an open lantern design would remove problems caused by the  lantern "breathing in" after a night time's use.

Does anyone out there know of its existence in the real world, or did it fail to get off the drawing board?


Attachments:
GEC Z5590 CO.jpg
GEC Z5590 CO.jpg [ 212.82 KiB | Viewed 10772 times ]

_________________
"I can't think what you want to go to London for, you won't find any better lampposts there..."
L.S. Lowry. 1887-1976.
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline
Site Administration
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 3402
Images: 27
Location: Salisbury
Interesting. The 01 code for London was abandoned in May 1990, but given the Telex reference, I suspect this was from the 1970s.

Yet another case of GEC making a lantern "for all seasons" - in other words yet another variant for what is probably a fairly small market, and for which they couldn't guarantee their fittings would be chosen for.

Perhaps Simon Cornwell knows more...


Top
 Profile  Personal album 
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 

All times are UTC



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests



Search for: